Raising capital is a critical step in building a startup, but it often comes with complex terms that can significantly impact your ownership and control of the company. Among these, anti-dilution provisions are some of the most misunderstood—and potentially costly—clauses in investor agreements. While they’re designed to protect investors, they can dramatically affect your equity if not properly negotiated.
This guide will break down what anti-dilution provisions are, why they matter, and how to navigate them during fundraising to protect your ownership.
An anti-dilution provision is a clause in an investor agreement (usually tied to preferred shares) that protects investors from losing value in their ownership stake if the company issues new shares at a lower price than they paid.
This situation, known as a down round, can occur if your company raises money at a valuation lower than in previous rounds. Anti-dilution clauses ensure that the investor’s equity percentage and ownership value are preserved or adjusted to compensate for the lower valuation.
Not all anti-dilution provisions are created equal. The type of clause in your agreement determines how much your equity will be affected in a down round.
Founder Takeaway: Full ratchet is rare in founder-friendly deals because it heavily dilutes early stakeholders.
Founder Takeaway: Weighted average is the most common and generally founder-friendlier option.
Founder Takeaway: If you can negotiate no anti-dilution terms, it’s a major win for founders.
Anti-dilution clauses are primarily designed to protect investors, but they can significantly dilute founders and early team members during future funding rounds. The wrong provision can leave founders with dramatically reduced ownership, making it harder to retain control over the company.
Here’s why they matter:
When negotiating anti-dilution clauses with investors, keep the following strategies in mind:
Weighted average anti-dilution is widely regarded as a fair middle ground. It balances investor protection with reasonable equity preservation for founders.
Define clear conditions for when anti-dilution protections apply. For example:
Propose an expiration on anti-dilution protections after a certain time or milestone (e.g., 18 months post-investment). This minimizes long-term risks for founders.
Instead of full anti-dilution, propose other terms that protect investor interests, such as board representation or participation rights in future rounds.
Anti-dilution clauses can have complex implications, especially when layered with other terms like liquidation preferences. Work with a startup-savvy lawyer to understand and negotiate these provisions.
Even if anti-dilution clauses seem straightforward, they can carry hidden risks:
A startup raises a Series A at $10M with full ratchet anti-dilution protection for investors. In Series B, the valuation drops to $5M.
Result: Series A investors’ shares are recalculated as if they were purchased at the new, lower price, dramatically diluting founders and employees.
Another startup negotiates weighted average anti-dilution. After a modest down round, founder ownership is preserved at a reasonable level, while investors still receive partial compensation.
Result: The startup raises funds, keeps founders motivated, and maintains goodwill with all stakeholders.
Anti-dilution provisions are a double-edged sword. While they protect investors from downside risk, they can significantly impact founder ownership and control if not handled carefully. Understanding the types of anti-dilution protections and negotiating reasonable terms is critical for maintaining the long-term health of your startup.
Looking for more tips on navigating funding negotiations? Explore LawHax for actionable insights and tools to protect your business and equity every step of the way.